One of the ways that a company can create new marketing
opportunities is to rebrand its established products and services. When a
market is saturated with your brand and you want to gain new exposure,
rebranding makes sense. This past year, JC Penney, Microsoft, Nissan (actually
bringing back the old "Datsun” logo) have undergone rebranding efforts in an
attempt to draw more attention from the marketplace.
Rebranding is more than a new ad campaign. It is creating a
new image of your product or service offerings in the minds of your customers.
When should you think about rebranding and when should you leave your old brand
be? Rebranding should be considered when you have something new to add to your
current offerings. If you follow the very competitive mobile phone market, you
will see a very strong rebranding effort every time a new generation of phones
hit the streets. A few years ago we would have never thought of calling our
phones "smart” or giving them a "G” rating, and if we did, we would have no
clue what it really meant. When did the flip phone die? When the new phones
were rebranded. An example of a phone brand that needed to rebrand, but did
not, is Blackberry. It once owned the mobile communications market. Now it is
fading behind the new market leaders – iPhones; Android OS based phones like
the Motorola Droid, Samsung Note or Galaxy SIII (with Android "Jellybean”); and
the new Nokia Windows phones. iPhone, Android Jellybean, SIII, Note – these are
all new branded products that have either captured the marketplace or are
emerging brands.
Another reason to consider rebranding is when you are losing
market share. When your competition begins to win over your customers, it is
time to reload and rebrand. After a while, any brand can become stale. When
that happens, you are in jeopardy of losing your clients to the new thing. This
is where an honest evaluation of what your customers are thinking becomes
crucial. You might want to get customer satisfaction research in place to
support or challenge your assumptions. You also might want to go beyond just a
satisfaction survey and find out what your customers need beyond what you are
currently giving them. Let’s face it; when a customer leaves, inside our business
we often label the customer as disloyal. In reality, you did not offer them
what they needed or they would not have left you. Identifying these needs
should be at the heart of your rebranding process. For instance, if you find
that your customers like your product offerings, but really need to have
delivery sooner than you have been making it happen; make changes to your
process to meet this demand and then rebrand your product to reflect this. You
could simply add a new tag line to your current logo – something like "To your
door in 24 hours” or "The right product, on time every time.” Just make sure
your actions as a company back up your rebranded marketing claims.
Another reason to rebrand is when you are trying to reach a
new demographic, a new industry or a niche segment within either of these. Soft
drink companies are notorious for rebranding their products. Do old people
drink Mountain Dew or Coca Cola? Think about the demographic to which energy
drinks are branded are marketed. Do skateboarding teenagers drink Monster or
Diet Dr. Pepper? Now think about sports drinks and the niche marketing segment
they are trying to reach. Do athletes drink Pepsi Max or Gatorade? All of these
are marketed to a specific demographic and a specific segment within that
demographic. Every now and then, the drink producers will push one of these
products at a new demographic segment. When they do, they always rebrand.
However, rebranding can be much like stepping into a
minefield if you have a loyal following of customers. And that loyalty can be
taken for granted until you make the change. Take for instance the University
of California, who redesigned their logo after 144 years. The result of the
new, hipper logo was a sea of protest that filled social media sites with
"hate-the-logo”. It wasn’t that the new logo had any offensive images or
phrases attached to it; it just wasn’t the "old” logo. (Click here to see the
two logos.) Haters, among other things, said it looked too corporate.
But hate for rebranding is not just an upper education thing. Corporations have
had their share of rebranding blunders over the years that set off protests.
Back in 2009, Tropicana Orange Juice was rebranded. The old orange with a straw
poked into its side logo was replaced with a green font and the "i” in
Tropicana dotted with an orange leaf. (Click here to see the two brands.) Customers criticized the new design, saying that they could
not find the product on their grocery shelves. The new carton was too generic
looking, they complained. When sales fell by 20% in one month, the marketing
executives got the message and the orange and straw logo was brought back.
Branding is more than changing the logo. Dressing the pig in
a silk waistcoat, as Charles Spurgeon was fond of saying, doesn’t fix anything.
Branding involves repositioning your product. It can include the value
proposition (this is what JC Penney tried to do this past year) or trying to
tap into a new demographic. If you are thinking of making changes to your
product or service offerings, give rebranding some thought. It can help capture
the attention of your target market. That is the true function of
marketing.
_____________________________
Campus Protests Return, but Over Rebranding,
by Tanzina Vega, NY Times, December 26, 2012
JCPenney Unveils Latest Attempt at Rebranding, by Elizabeth Whittlesey, www.minyanville.com, July 25, 2012
Microsoft rebrands itself with new logo, http://www.t3.com/news/microsoft-rebrands-itself-with-new-logo
14 Companies That Reversed Their Horrible Attempts At
Rebranding, by Mallory Russell, Business
Insider March 25, 2012 http://www.businessinsider.com/14-brands-that-had-to-reverse-their-horrible-attempts-at-rebranding-2012-3?op=1#ixzz2HVZNTyCW
Tropicana Line's Sales Plunge 20% Post-Rebranding OJ
Rivals Posted Double-Digit Increases as Pure Premium Plummeted, by Natalie Zmuda Bio, Advertising Age, April 02,
2009
Photo by Victor Correia